Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Saturday, January 7, 2012
Harbor District Slow to Respond to Raw Sewage Reports
Improving water quality at Pillar Point Harbor is good for local business that depends on tourism, good for the commercial fishing fleet that prides itself on providing the freshest locally and sustainably caught seafood and good for the environment. A lot could be done to prevent sewage dumping, fuel spills and bilge pumping oil into Pillar Point Harbor.
Recently I met with Tracy Pearson, a retired tugboat captain, regarding his concerns about raw sewage being pumped into Pillar Point Harbor. Mr. Pearson has been a slip holder and vessel owner at Pillar Point Harbor for the past 23 years.
Mr. Pearson has witnessed live-aboards dumping raw sewage into Pillar Point Harbor for some time. Starting in June of last year he reported the problem to harbor employees, administration, and commissioners on numerous occasions. The Harbor District application for berth rental section G requires authorized pumping, pursuant to Section 3.1.17.7 of the SMCHD Ordinance Code. Dumping of sewage into Pillar Point Harbor is not allowed.
Mr. Pearson's first report was via phone message on June 20, 2011 when he noticed raw sewage drifting by his boat the S/V Sun Star. He did not receive a response to his voicemail message.
On July 21, 2011 Mr. Pearson notified Robert Johnson, then Harbor Master via email about the problem and no action was taken. On August 18, 2011 Mr. Pearson wrote to Peter Grenell, Harbor District Manager and received a reply on August 24, 2011 that said Mr. Grenell would “follow up and take appropriate actions".
Mr. Pearson has attended two Harbor Commission meetings, September 7, 2011 (meeting minutes) and November 2, 2011 (meeting minutes). During public comment Mr. Pearson voiced concerns about the District's lack of response to his June 20, 2011 report of raw sewage floating near C dock. He reminded the Commissioners that allowing sewage discharge at Pillar Point Harbor is a violation of the Clean Water Act. Mr. Pearson suggested dye packs as a solution and requested that the District take appropriate action without further delay. He also pointed out that it was urgent that the sewage problem be resolved in advance of crab season opening. Dungeness crab is a species that is sold live from holding tanks that cycle harbor water to keep crab fresh.
In October, November, and December Mr. Pearson received his monthly slip bill in the mail with a flyer about the annual holiday boat decorating event but no notice addressing the sewage problem.
Mr. Pearson filed a written complaint with Cal/EPA, contacted Karissa Anderson at the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District, and talked with Gregory Smith, Supervisor of the Water Protection and Land Use Programs at San Mateo County Environmental Health.
It is my understanding that the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District recently (before Thanksgiving) did some water testing, including DNA testing, at Pillar Point Harbor under boats at ABC docks (the live-aboard docks). Some slip holders are concerned that limited testing on a few random days may not tell the whole story about localized water quality concerns affecting the inner jetty at Pillar Point Harbor.
Mr. Pearson also contacted the San Francisco Water Board. The SF Water Board contacted Peter Grenell, Harbor District Manager, twice recently and a letter from the District was mailed to slip holders on December 29, 2011 regarding upcoming inspections. Pillar Point Harbor patrol started vessel inspections this month that include installing dye packs in the holding tanks and sealing Y-valves to prevent discharge from going overboard.
It took the District five months to respond to Tracy's original concern about sewage dumping. It would be good to see the District enforcing its own policies, aimed at maintain a healthy harbor, on a regular basis. Hopefully the District will adopt new polices and best practices that are in accordance with other California harbor facilities that have proven track records.
Santa Barbara Marina has a strong water pollution prevention program in place. When a boat arrives at the Santa Barbara Marina the harbor master's office immediately sends a staff person out to meet the boat and drop dye tablets into the head and they check the results periodically. This simple solution helps a lot.
Ongoing problems with the Pillar Point Harbor pumpout facility have resulted in some frustrated boat owners giving up and dumping sewage. A daily inspection of the pumpout facility would insure that the facility is operational.
The solution to spillage when fueling and bilge pumping oil into the harbor is simple and again Santa Barbara is a great example of its implementation. Santa Barbara Marina notifies and continuously reminds boat owners that the harbor master’s office provides bilge pads at no charge to anyone requesting them. It is my understanding that Pillar Point Harbor also offers free bilge pads in the case of an emergency and the District currently charges a fee for the installation of booms around a leaking vessel. Some Pillar Point Harbor boat owners are unaware of the importance of using bilge pads to soak up oil and are less inclined to request booms in an emergency due to the cost.
Education is an important part of improving water quality. Santa Barbara Marina attendants watch vessels while they are fueling and offer help to prevent fuel spills. They inform vessels about the large fines that are the consequence of spillage. And, they tell boat owners that they are required to report all spills. The result is that the water is clean and there is very little oil or fuel in the harbor. In contrast to Pillar Point where you will find a sheen of oil and fuel on the surface every evening.
Additional concerns include the District's unwillingness to repair or replace the non-functioning harbor security camera system and management's refusal to videotape Commission meetings. The lack on concern for safety, security, and accountability points to a significant disconnect between the Harbor Commission and the people the District serves.
Broken security cameras at Pillar Point Harbor have resulted in missed opportunities to reduce crime. In November, a 32-foot fiberglass boat named "Tonita" was sunk when someone turned a hose on inside the cabin and filled the boat with water. It is suspected that this act of vandalism was a form of retribution against the owner of the vessel, Chris Eatingerred, a rock crab fishermen. Mr. Eatingerred was thought to be fishing Dungeness crab at a time when Dungeness crab fishermen were on strike. This month another commercial fishermen had his truck vandalized in the harbor parking lot. Other reports of crime have been made over the years including a Harbor Patrol employee's car being stolen while at work. Apparently, security cameras stopped functioning on or before 2005.
Another place working cameras would be beneficial is at Harbor District meetings. A couple years ago I suggested that Harbor Commission meetings be videotaped. In response to the suggestion Peter Grenell, Harbor District Manager said, "It is in the best interest of the District not to videotape meetings." Videotaping meetings, broadcasting meetings on public access television, and archiving meetings on the District's website are reasonable requests that would provide a transparent process. One wonders... what are they afraid of?
I urge the District to repair or replace Harbor security cameras and to videotape Commission meetings no later than February 2012.
Five months is too long to wait for the District to respond to public health and safety concerns. A safe and healthy harbor benefits everyone and it's good for local business.
Sabrina Brennan
for San Mateo County Harbor Commissioner 2012
campaign website
campaign facebook
twitter
Recently I met with Tracy Pearson, a retired tugboat captain, regarding his concerns about raw sewage being pumped into Pillar Point Harbor. Mr. Pearson has been a slip holder and vessel owner at Pillar Point Harbor for the past 23 years.
Mr. Pearson has witnessed live-aboards dumping raw sewage into Pillar Point Harbor for some time. Starting in June of last year he reported the problem to harbor employees, administration, and commissioners on numerous occasions. The Harbor District application for berth rental section G requires authorized pumping, pursuant to Section 3.1.17.7 of the SMCHD Ordinance Code. Dumping of sewage into Pillar Point Harbor is not allowed.
Mr. Pearson's first report was via phone message on June 20, 2011 when he noticed raw sewage drifting by his boat the S/V Sun Star. He did not receive a response to his voicemail message.
On July 21, 2011 Mr. Pearson notified Robert Johnson, then Harbor Master via email about the problem and no action was taken. On August 18, 2011 Mr. Pearson wrote to Peter Grenell, Harbor District Manager and received a reply on August 24, 2011 that said Mr. Grenell would “follow up and take appropriate actions".
Mr. Pearson has attended two Harbor Commission meetings, September 7, 2011 (meeting minutes) and November 2, 2011 (meeting minutes). During public comment Mr. Pearson voiced concerns about the District's lack of response to his June 20, 2011 report of raw sewage floating near C dock. He reminded the Commissioners that allowing sewage discharge at Pillar Point Harbor is a violation of the Clean Water Act. Mr. Pearson suggested dye packs as a solution and requested that the District take appropriate action without further delay. He also pointed out that it was urgent that the sewage problem be resolved in advance of crab season opening. Dungeness crab is a species that is sold live from holding tanks that cycle harbor water to keep crab fresh.
In October, November, and December Mr. Pearson received his monthly slip bill in the mail with a flyer about the annual holiday boat decorating event but no notice addressing the sewage problem.
Mr. Pearson filed a written complaint with Cal/EPA, contacted Karissa Anderson at the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District, and talked with Gregory Smith, Supervisor of the Water Protection and Land Use Programs at San Mateo County Environmental Health.
It is my understanding that the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District recently (before Thanksgiving) did some water testing, including DNA testing, at Pillar Point Harbor under boats at ABC docks (the live-aboard docks). Some slip holders are concerned that limited testing on a few random days may not tell the whole story about localized water quality concerns affecting the inner jetty at Pillar Point Harbor.
Mr. Pearson also contacted the San Francisco Water Board. The SF Water Board contacted Peter Grenell, Harbor District Manager, twice recently and a letter from the District was mailed to slip holders on December 29, 2011 regarding upcoming inspections. Pillar Point Harbor patrol started vessel inspections this month that include installing dye packs in the holding tanks and sealing Y-valves to prevent discharge from going overboard.
It took the District five months to respond to Tracy's original concern about sewage dumping. It would be good to see the District enforcing its own policies, aimed at maintain a healthy harbor, on a regular basis. Hopefully the District will adopt new polices and best practices that are in accordance with other California harbor facilities that have proven track records.
Santa Barbara Marina has a strong water pollution prevention program in place. When a boat arrives at the Santa Barbara Marina the harbor master's office immediately sends a staff person out to meet the boat and drop dye tablets into the head and they check the results periodically. This simple solution helps a lot.
Ongoing problems with the Pillar Point Harbor pumpout facility have resulted in some frustrated boat owners giving up and dumping sewage. A daily inspection of the pumpout facility would insure that the facility is operational.
The solution to spillage when fueling and bilge pumping oil into the harbor is simple and again Santa Barbara is a great example of its implementation. Santa Barbara Marina notifies and continuously reminds boat owners that the harbor master’s office provides bilge pads at no charge to anyone requesting them. It is my understanding that Pillar Point Harbor also offers free bilge pads in the case of an emergency and the District currently charges a fee for the installation of booms around a leaking vessel. Some Pillar Point Harbor boat owners are unaware of the importance of using bilge pads to soak up oil and are less inclined to request booms in an emergency due to the cost.
Education is an important part of improving water quality. Santa Barbara Marina attendants watch vessels while they are fueling and offer help to prevent fuel spills. They inform vessels about the large fines that are the consequence of spillage. And, they tell boat owners that they are required to report all spills. The result is that the water is clean and there is very little oil or fuel in the harbor. In contrast to Pillar Point where you will find a sheen of oil and fuel on the surface every evening.
Additional concerns include the District's unwillingness to repair or replace the non-functioning harbor security camera system and management's refusal to videotape Commission meetings. The lack on concern for safety, security, and accountability points to a significant disconnect between the Harbor Commission and the people the District serves.
Broken security cameras at Pillar Point Harbor have resulted in missed opportunities to reduce crime. In November, a 32-foot fiberglass boat named "Tonita" was sunk when someone turned a hose on inside the cabin and filled the boat with water. It is suspected that this act of vandalism was a form of retribution against the owner of the vessel, Chris Eatingerred, a rock crab fishermen. Mr. Eatingerred was thought to be fishing Dungeness crab at a time when Dungeness crab fishermen were on strike. This month another commercial fishermen had his truck vandalized in the harbor parking lot. Other reports of crime have been made over the years including a Harbor Patrol employee's car being stolen while at work. Apparently, security cameras stopped functioning on or before 2005.
Another place working cameras would be beneficial is at Harbor District meetings. A couple years ago I suggested that Harbor Commission meetings be videotaped. In response to the suggestion Peter Grenell, Harbor District Manager said, "It is in the best interest of the District not to videotape meetings." Videotaping meetings, broadcasting meetings on public access television, and archiving meetings on the District's website are reasonable requests that would provide a transparent process. One wonders... what are they afraid of?
I urge the District to repair or replace Harbor security cameras and to videotape Commission meetings no later than February 2012.
Five months is too long to wait for the District to respond to public health and safety concerns. A safe and healthy harbor benefits everyone and it's good for local business.
Sabrina Brennan
for San Mateo County Harbor Commissioner 2012
campaign website
campaign facebook
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
San Mateo County coastal land added to GGNRA
San Jose Mercury News
The Associated Press
Posted: 12/13/2011 07:24:17 AM PST
Updated: 12/13/2011 07:24:17 AM PST
MOSS BEACH, Calif.—A nearly 4,000-acre plot of land along the San Mateo County coast has been added to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
The National Park Service announced on Monday that it has taken over ownership of Rancho Corral de Tierra. Congress approved the final installment of the $15 million purchase price this summer.
The property, which overlooks the towns of Moss Beach and Montara, will serve as the southern gateway to the 82,000-acre Golden Gate recreation area.
The San Jose Mercury News reports that the ranch property is home to mountain lions, peregrine falcons and two species of plants known to exist nowhere else in the world: Montara Mountain blue bush lupin and Montara manzanita.
Formal trail heads and national park signs are expected be in place next summer.
The Associated Press
Posted: 12/13/2011 07:24:17 AM PST
Updated: 12/13/2011 07:24:17 AM PST
MOSS BEACH, Calif.—A nearly 4,000-acre plot of land along the San Mateo County coast has been added to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area.
The National Park Service announced on Monday that it has taken over ownership of Rancho Corral de Tierra. Congress approved the final installment of the $15 million purchase price this summer.
The property, which overlooks the towns of Moss Beach and Montara, will serve as the southern gateway to the 82,000-acre Golden Gate recreation area.
The San Jose Mercury News reports that the ranch property is home to mountain lions, peregrine falcons and two species of plants known to exist nowhere else in the world: Montara Mountain blue bush lupin and Montara manzanita.
Formal trail heads and national park signs are expected be in place next summer.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Attorneys may seek to postpone June election for San Mateo County supervisors pending outcome of discrimination suit
Daily News Staff Writer
Posted: 11/23/2011 12:00:00 AM PST
Updated: 11/24/2011 12:47:20 AM PST
The attorneys suing San Mateo County for allegedly discriminating against minorities through its election process said they plan to file a legal motion to postpone the June 2012 election for three board of supervisors seats.
San Mateo is the only county in California that allows voters to elect supervisors countywide instead of by district. In April, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, the Asian Law Caucus, Arnold & Porter LLP and Seattle University Law Professor Joaquin Avila sued the county on behalf of six Asian and Hispanic residents, saying its at-large election system dilutes the votes of those minorities, a violation of the California Voting Rights Act.
On Tuesday, Superior Court Judge Robert Foiles determined the lawsuit would go to trial next year on Aug. 20, despite protests from the plaintiffs who wanted the date set in March, before the June election.
"Our position is we wanted an early trial to get the issue resolved as quickly as possible and also prevent any illegal elections from going forward," Lawyers Committee attorney Robert Rubin said Wednesday. "The judge refused to give that, so we're most likely filing a preliminary injunction motion (to postpone the election)."
The motion could be filed within weeks, Rubin said.
The county's attorneys say there's no evidence that Asian and Hispanic voters have not been able to elect representatives of their choosing and point out that county voters support the at-large system, having twice defeated charter amendments to change it, most recently in 1978.
If the court forces district elections it would be "taking away the rights of the county voters and elected officials" to determine their own system, a violation of the state constitution, said James Wagstaffe, an attorney representing the county.
Last year, the board of supervisors chose not to put a measure on the ballot asking today's voters which system they prefer.
In San Mateo County, Asian and Hispanic residents made up nearly half of the population in 2010, according to census data, yet neither minority group is represented on the five-member board. Only one Hispanic and no Asian candidates have been elected to the board in the past 16 years, according to the lawsuit.
A majority of Asian-American or Hispanic voters might be able to elect a supervisor of their choice by gathering enough votes within one district to back a candidate, but that strength is weakened by a system that requires a majority of votes countywide to win, Rubin said.
Wagstaffe said the at-large system has been popular because residents "want to have supervisors accountable to the whole county," not just their district constituents.
The three supervisors whose seats are up in June are Dave Pine, Rose Jacobs Gibson and Adrienne Tissier.
Email Bonnie Eslinger at beslinger@dailynewsgroup.com.
Rosanne Foust lowest vote getter of all elected to Redwood City Council in 2011
Rosanne Foust is a past Redwood City mayor, current council member, registered Republican, and vice president of San Mateo County Economic Development Association (SAMCEDA). Foust was recently reelected to the Redwood City Council in November 2011. She was the lowest vote getter of all candidates elected in Nov. Foust and her husband Jim Hartnett (former Redwood City mayor and council member) both support the Cargill project.
The Daily News
Bonnie Eslinger
Friday, July 30, 2010
Redwood City Council Member Rosanne Foust had a conflict of interest when she voted to push along Cargill's controversial Saltworks development, a state political watchdog agency has concluded following a Menlo Park council member's complaint.
The state Fair Political Practices Commission chose not to fine Foust because she acted on the advice of an attorney but warned her not to cast any future votes affecting the development.
Foust's conflict stems from her role as member of a city council that can approve or reject a project strongly endorsed by the influential San Mateo County Economic Development Association, or SAMCEDA, that she heads as CEO.
Critics of the Saltworks project have contended Foust cannot make objective decisions about it as a council member since her day job is to advance the development association's interests.
Read more >>
The Daily News
Bonnie Eslinger
Friday, July 30, 2010
Redwood City Council Member Rosanne Foust had a conflict of interest when she voted to push along Cargill's controversial Saltworks development, a state political watchdog agency has concluded following a Menlo Park council member's complaint.
The state Fair Political Practices Commission chose not to fine Foust because she acted on the advice of an attorney but warned her not to cast any future votes affecting the development.
Foust's conflict stems from her role as member of a city council that can approve or reject a project strongly endorsed by the influential San Mateo County Economic Development Association, or SAMCEDA, that she heads as CEO.
Critics of the Saltworks project have contended Foust cannot make objective decisions about it as a council member since her day job is to advance the development association's interests.
Read more >>
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Open letter to Mr. Khosla, tear down that gate
Herhold: Mr. Khosla, tear down that gate
You're a fabulously wealthy man now, Mr. Khosla, but somewhere I don't think you've entirely forgotten average folks: As an engineering graduate in India at the age of 20, you started a soy milk company to cater to the poor who didn't have refrigerators.
So as you think about what to do with the road that leads down to Martin's Beach -- a one-time fishing village that has maybe 40-plus cabins and dwellings -- let me introduce you to the family of Robert Barcellos, a Portuguese-American from the Central Valley.
Beginning with his grandfather, Barcellos' family has been coming to Martin's Beach for nearly 100 years, paying 25 cents at first to use the road and then the $5 or more fee of recent years. They come for the smelt, the 6-inch fish.
Smelt jumpers
A 1957 story in the Mercury News had a picture of their net at Martin's Beach. "Most smelt-jumpers take their fish home,'' the story said. "But some enthusiasts say, 'Net 'em now, eat 'em now.' ''
Barcellos told me: "Our personal story comes from being able to visit there easily. We were always welcome. Now there's a sense that new people have taken control and that we're not going to be welcome.''
Mr. Khosla, Californians regard the beach, and for that matter, access to the beach, as sacred. It's why we have the Coastal Commission. It's why U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo has written to the commission, calling upon it to act.
I don't doubt that you can create a legal case for your action. You've hired Joan Gallo, San Jose's former city attorney, to represent you. You'll undoubtedly argue that the Coastal Act protects the beach covered by water at high tide, not access by private road.
I'd urge you to reconsider, and not just because you're a big environmental investor who will catch flak for this.
Wise words
You might pay attention to the words of Tony Judt, a wonderful historian who wrote a book, "Ill Fares the Land,'' before he died of Lou Gehrig's disease last year at age 62.
"Something is profoundly wrong with the way we live today,'' Judt wrote. "For 30 years we have made a virtue out of the pursuit of material self-interest: indeed, this very pursuit now constitutes whatever remains of our sense of collective purpose.
"We know what things cost but have no idea what they are worth. We no longer ask of a judicial ruling or a legislative act: Is it good? Is it fair? Is it just? Is it right?''
If you ask yourself those questions, Mr. Khosla, the answer is clear. Open the road. Charge $5 if you must. But let the public in. Your beach isn't a private treasure. It never was.
By Scott Herhold
Mercury News Columnist
Posted: 11/12/2011 08:03:46 PM PST
Updated: 11/13/2011 06:19:23 PM PST
Mr. Vinod Khosla
Khosla Ventures
Menlo Park, CA
Dear Mr. Khosla:
The jig is up. The dance is over. It's time to let the public back into Martin's Beach, that lovely coastal property you have six miles south of Half Moon Bay. Not because it's legally proper. Not because you face political pressure. But because it's the right thing to do.
When you bought the property back in 2008 and padlocked the road to the public, you disguised your ownership. That's understandable: You're a famous cleantech investor. Now it's time to honor access to that same environment you hope to spare.
Mercury News Columnist
Posted: 11/12/2011 08:03:46 PM PST
Updated: 11/13/2011 06:19:23 PM PST
Mr. Vinod Khosla
Khosla Ventures
Menlo Park, CA
Dear Mr. Khosla:
The jig is up. The dance is over. It's time to let the public back into Martin's Beach, that lovely coastal property you have six miles south of Half Moon Bay. Not because it's legally proper. Not because you face political pressure. But because it's the right thing to do.
When you bought the property back in 2008 and padlocked the road to the public, you disguised your ownership. That's understandable: You're a famous cleantech investor. Now it's time to honor access to that same environment you hope to spare.
You're a fabulously wealthy man now, Mr. Khosla, but somewhere I don't think you've entirely forgotten average folks: As an engineering graduate in India at the age of 20, you started a soy milk company to cater to the poor who didn't have refrigerators.
So as you think about what to do with the road that leads down to Martin's Beach -- a one-time fishing village that has maybe 40-plus cabins and dwellings -- let me introduce you to the family of Robert Barcellos, a Portuguese-American from the Central Valley.
Beginning with his grandfather, Barcellos' family has been coming to Martin's Beach for nearly 100 years, paying 25 cents at first to use the road and then the $5 or more fee of recent years. They come for the smelt, the 6-inch fish.
Smelt jumpers
A 1957 story in the Mercury News had a picture of their net at Martin's Beach. "Most smelt-jumpers take their fish home,'' the story said. "But some enthusiasts say, 'Net 'em now, eat 'em now.' ''
Barcellos told me: "Our personal story comes from being able to visit there easily. We were always welcome. Now there's a sense that new people have taken control and that we're not going to be welcome.''
Mr. Khosla, Californians regard the beach, and for that matter, access to the beach, as sacred. It's why we have the Coastal Commission. It's why U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo has written to the commission, calling upon it to act.
I don't doubt that you can create a legal case for your action. You've hired Joan Gallo, San Jose's former city attorney, to represent you. You'll undoubtedly argue that the Coastal Act protects the beach covered by water at high tide, not access by private road.
I'd urge you to reconsider, and not just because you're a big environmental investor who will catch flak for this.
Wise words
You might pay attention to the words of Tony Judt, a wonderful historian who wrote a book, "Ill Fares the Land,'' before he died of Lou Gehrig's disease last year at age 62.
"Something is profoundly wrong with the way we live today,'' Judt wrote. "For 30 years we have made a virtue out of the pursuit of material self-interest: indeed, this very pursuit now constitutes whatever remains of our sense of collective purpose.
"We know what things cost but have no idea what they are worth. We no longer ask of a judicial ruling or a legislative act: Is it good? Is it fair? Is it just? Is it right?''
If you ask yourself those questions, Mr. Khosla, the answer is clear. Open the road. Charge $5 if you must. But let the public in. Your beach isn't a private treasure. It never was.
Why did Vinod Khosla lock the gate to Martin's Beach?
The Barcellos family has been coming to Martin's Beach for nearly 100 years to cast nets for smelt.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Monday, October 3, 2011
Harbor District unveils Pillar Point Harbor development, Monday 7pm
Pillar Point Harbor
PUBLIC MEETING:
Monday, October 3, 2011, 7 pm - 9 pm
at Half Moon Bay Yacht Club, Princeton
San Mateo County Harbor District: Updates on Pillar Point Harbor plans including the Perched Beach Improvement Project. Plans for new District Administration Offices, a new bulkhead, and updates will be presented for the general public, tenants and users of the harbor.
HMB Yacht Club
214 Princeton Avenue
Princeton, CA 94019
PUBLIC MEETING:
Monday, October 3, 2011, 7 pm - 9 pm
at Half Moon Bay Yacht Club, Princeton
San Mateo County Harbor District: Updates on Pillar Point Harbor plans including the Perched Beach Improvement Project. Plans for new District Administration Offices, a new bulkhead, and updates will be presented for the general public, tenants and users of the harbor.
HMB Yacht Club
214 Princeton Avenue
Princeton, CA 94019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)